Back

Total environmental impact of consumption

The indicator shows the impacts across all areas of the environment both in Switzerland and abroad arising from Swiss final demand. For example, raw materials are required for the production of consumer goods, and land and water are required by settlements, transport, and for the production of food and animal feed. While the overuse of resources in Switzerland is likely to affect the economic system and quality of life here in the medium to long term, it is already having severe impacts in other countries, for example due to the logging of forests, climate change and water scarcity.

Assessment of the state
poor poor
Assessment of the trend
positive positive
Total pressure 2023: 29.1974910513942 Total pressure 2022: 27.1201559695949 Total pressure 2021: 26.3407012352518 Total pressure 2020: 26.7995458779253 Total pressure 2019: 28.4329139052349 Total pressure 2018: 28.5715569161313 Total pressure 2017: 29.9121001818992 Total pressure 2016: 30.6098913474039 Total pressure 2015: 31.1179777184564 Total pressure 2014: 30.3615367790466 Total pressure 2013: 31.9551076737722 Total pressure 2012: 31.2279982807774 Total pressure 2011: 31.7875654245949 Total pressure 2010: 31.8455136167283 Total pressure 2009: 31.5222950340444 Total pressure 2008: 32.2152331470391 Total pressure 2007: 32.7533660320033 Total pressure 2006: 34.4346201940888 Total pressure 2005: 34.6849242667238 Total pressure 2004: 34.4845771455576 Total pressure 2003: 35.2370956659227 Total pressure 2002: 35.5261312050439 Total pressure 2001: 37.835996493995 Total pressure 2000: 36.8629164118902 Abroad 2023: 22.4316810355467 In Switzerland 2023: 6.76581001584751 Abroad 2022: 20.5209968574323 In Switzerland 2022: 6.5991591121626 Abroad 2021: 19.2846166646132 In Switzerland 2021: 7.05608457063859 Abroad 2020: 19.5460702520335 In Switzerland 2020: 7.25347562589185 Abroad 2019: 20.3280670963301 In Switzerland 2019: 8.10484680890483 Abroad 2018: 20.4049430822338 In Switzerland 2018: 8.16661383389746 Abroad 2017: 21.4726753747459 In Switzerland 2017: 8.43942480715326 Abroad 2016: 21.8617981156389 In Switzerland 2016: 8.74809323176501 Abroad 2015: 22.248350577608 In Switzerland 2015: 8.86962714084838 Abroad 2014: 21.4975878725853 In Switzerland 2014: 8.86394890646134 Abroad 2013: 22.4239307088755 In Switzerland 2013: 9.53117696489671 Abroad 2012: 21.8954205477268 In Switzerland 2012: 9.33257773305061 Abroad 2011: 22.2105135482993 In Switzerland 2011: 9.57705187629564 Abroad 2010: 21.6637402852152 In Switzerland 2010: 10.1817733315131 Abroad 2009: 21.2567666099494 In Switzerland 2009: 10.265528424095 Abroad 2008: 21.8267735842058 In Switzerland 2008: 10.3884595628333 Abroad 2007: 22.2487244838685 In Switzerland 2007: 10.5046415481348 Abroad 2006: 23.2464924911469 In Switzerland 2006: 11.1881277029419 Abroad 2005: 23.2676754160628 In Switzerland 2005: 11.417248850661 Abroad 2004: 22.6973302912553 In Switzerland 2004: 11.7872468543023 Abroad 2003: 22.9312459942856 In Switzerland 2003: 12.3058496716371 Abroad 2002: 22.8834636971956 In Switzerland 2002: 12.6426675078483 Abroad 2001: 24.9068749528301 In Switzerland 2001: 12.9291215411649 Abroad 2000: 23.5733852075086 In Switzerland 2000: 13.2895312043816

Data for the graph: Excel | Source: Umwelt-Fussabdrücke der Schweiz: Entwicklung zwischen 2000 und 2023 (EBP/Impact Economics 2026)
Abroad  2023: 201038.512814277 In Switzerland 2023: 60636.9349410096 Abroad  2022: 180900.487882056 In Switzerland 2022: 58174.1282499715 Abroad  2021: 168524.234547172 In Switzerland 2021: 61661.6483411354 Abroad  2020: 169470.292906206 In Switzerland 2020: 62889.8097191701 Abroad  2019: 174944.016257231 In Switzerland 2019: 69750.5790973797 Abroad  2018: 174350.587099611 In Switzerland 2018: 69779.8524023104 Abroad  2017: 182176.969327143 In Switzerland 2017: 71601.1771891133 Abroad  2016: 184066.502324528 In Switzerland 2016: 73655.0083695071 Abroad  2015: 185264.818551915 In Switzerland 2015: 73858.5027748642 Abroad  2014: 177089.948700008 In Switzerland 2014: 73018.2505324938 Abroad  2013: 182522.521539816 In Switzerland 2013: 77580.2634899592 Abroad  2012: 176018.599508409 In Switzerland 2012: 75025.1523506578 Abroad  2011: 176677.128123142 In Switzerland 2011: 76182.2106323977 Abroad  2010: 170363.913567816 In Switzerland 2010: 80069.5876602994 Abroad  2009: 165501.061012344 In Switzerland 2009: 79925.4127974898 Abroad  2008: 168106.667090157 In Switzerland 2008: 80010.4196147654 Abroad  2007: 168945.555875909 In Switzerland 2007: 79766.932567913 Abroad  2006: 174551.844781482 In Switzerland 2006: 84008.7308200609 Abroad  2005: 173556.569190866 In Switzerland 2005: 85162.7205849337 Abroad  2004: 168303.019237348 In Switzerland 2004: 87403.6377238308 Abroad  2003: 168869.089326326 In Switzerland 2003: 90622.098247687 Abroad  2002: 167366.289612126 In Switzerland 2002: 92466.6116802793 Abroad  2001: 180715.641972127 In Switzerland 2001: 93809.2194975181 Abroad  2000: 169823.963571078 In Switzerland 2000: 95738.5137205813

Data for the graph: Excel | Source: Umwelt-Fussabdrücke der Schweiz: Entwicklung zwischen 2000 und 2023 (EBP/Impact Economics 2026)
Efficiency of the total environmental impact  2023: 138.405045993931 Efficiency of the total environmental impact  2022: 148.332497879492 Efficiency of the total environmental impact  2021: 151.42171430953 Efficiency of the total environmental impact  2020: 149.560436738728 Efficiency of the total environmental impact  2019: 141.83699830198 Efficiency of the total environmental impact  2018: 139.469974937291 Efficiency of the total environmental impact  2017: 132.619396604802 Efficiency of the total environmental impact  2016: 128.620847746383 Efficiency of the total environmental impact  2015: 126.581590246368 Efficiency of the total environmental impact  2014: 128.89053277446 Efficiency of the total environmental impact  2013: 121.357282672372 Efficiency of the total environmental impact  2012: 126.738818558166 Efficiency of the total environmental impact  2011: 126.956376766824 Efficiency of the total environmental impact  2010: 122.495154053113 Efficiency of the total environmental impact  2009: 125.098171043502 Efficiency of the total environmental impact  2008: 121.134382004941 Efficiency of the total environmental impact  2007: 117.39197362513 Efficiency of the total environmental impact  2006: 112.505482013183 Efficiency of the total environmental impact  2005: 110.21764204192 Efficiency of the total environmental impact  2004: 107.09455904401 Efficiency of the total environmental impact  2003: 105.626416690649 Efficiency of the total environmental impact  2002: 104.440595494841 Efficiency of the total environmental impact  2001: 98.7760416793775 Efficiency of the total environmental impact  2000: 100
Trend in total environmental efficiency (quotient from economic domestic end final demand and total environmental impact)

Data for the graph: Excel | Source: EBP & Impact Economics 2026

Comment

Per capita

The total environmental footprint decreased by 21 % between 2000 and 2023 (with annual fluctuations), from around 37 to 29 million eco-points. Since many products are imported, the environment is mainly impacted abroad. In 2023, around 77 % of the environmental impact occurred beyond national borders.

The total environmental impact exceeds the threshold values for sustainable resource use, which are based on ecological boundaries. The reduction achieved so far is not sufficient to reach a resource-compatible level – the footprint would have to be reduced by around 73% (EBP/Impact Economics 2026).

Furthermore, the progress made so far does not cover all environmental areas. Finally, the footprint increased in 2023 compared to the previous year (around +10 %). This is why the status is assessed as poor.

Since the production and consumption of goods and services are associated with environmental impacts, one might expect the total impact to increase in line with final demand. This is not the case: while Swiss final demand increased between 2000 and 2023, the total environmental impact decreased. The development is therefore assessed positively.

The current development is due, for example, to successes in Switzerland in air pollution control and the protection of the ozone layer. Legal requirements and technological developments have played a central role. Larger market shares of environmentally friendly goods and services may also have contributed.

In absolute terms

The absolute total environmental footprint has fallen by over 1% over the entire period under review, taking into account the increase in the Swiss resident population.

Efficiency

During the period under review, the efficiency of the total environmental impact improved: the efficiency index rose from 100 to 138. A long-term decoupling between prosperity and total environmental impact has therefore taken place.

International comparison

The indicator in eco-points is quantified on the basis of Switzerland’s environmental policy targets. Hence there is no international comparison. The approach has been adopted in the scientific debate in other countries like Germany and Japan.

Method

Method for aggregating different types of environmental impact: In order to record and evaluate the total impact across all environmental factors such as emissions in the air and water, heavy metals in the ground, consumption of raw materials, etc., methods are required that are also capable of expressing environmental impacts as a figure. This example uses the ecological scarcity method – also known as the UBP method. This method expresses all environmental impacts in the unit of eco-points (Umweltbelastungspunkte, UBP). In the UBP method, the various environmental impacts are weighted according to the distance of the current environmental situation (emissions and demand on resources) to the existing targets of a country or region using eco-factors (“distance-to-target approach”). In Switzerland, the UBP method is geared towards Switzerland’s environmental goals and international environmental goals supported by Switzerland, which are in turn based on scientific knowledge. The further a current pollutant emission is from the target, the greater the significance of its environmental impact within the overall balance. However, the true extent of the environmental impact ultimately depends on the quantity of pollutants emitted. The emitted quantity is therefore multiplied with the eco-factor of the emission.

Footprint perspective method: When modelling the environmental impact caused by final demand, consideration is given to the entire value chain for all goods and services consumed, i.e. the extraction, production and transportation, etc., right up to their use and disposal. In addition to the resources used and emissions produced in Switzerland, the pressure on the environment in other countries is also taken into account. The environmental impact caused by export goods is deducted, as this is not included in domestic consumption. This is in line with the system boundaries of the footprint or consumption perspective.

The underlying calculation comes from the publication : EBP & Impact Economics. 2026. Umwelt-Fussabdrücke der Schweiz: Entwicklung zwischen 2000 und 2023. Bundesamt für Umwelt. Download

Comparison with the “ecological footprint”: This indicator is related to, but should not be confused with, the “ecological footprint” as defined by the Global Footprint Network. From the point of view of consumption, this indicator consolidates direct land use, wild-caught fish, and the areas of forest (theoretically) required to offset fossil carbon emissions into one figure. The ecological footprint is not a comprehensive environmental indicator. It does not take account of consumption of fresh water and other renewable and non-renewable natural resources, the loss of biodiversity or the environmental impact of air pollutants, heavy metals, nitrogen and persistent pollutants. Its main benefits are clear communication and widespread recognition. As a projection, Switzerland’s ecological footprint exceeds its global biocapacity by almost three times. Despite major methodical differences, the resulting need for action is similar to that produced by the UBP method.

Basis for assessment of the trend

Targeted trend Initial value Final value Variation in % Observed trend Assessment
Decrease Average 2000-2002 Average 2021-2023 -25.01% Decrease positive
Basis: Total pressure
 
Last updated on: 24.02.2026